2008 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Colorado. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 410 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Colorado. (258 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Colorado | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | Colorado | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 74 L |