2008 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1958 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1958 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1958 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 615 kg more than 1958 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Wartburg 312. (82 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Epica | 1958 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
Model | Epica | 312 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 82 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2460 mm |