2008 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 575 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Epica (195 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Epica | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
Model | Epica | 312 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 43 L |