2008 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1966 Citroen Ami
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Epica | 1966 Citroen Ami | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Epica | Ami |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 25 L |