2008 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 93 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Epica | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Epica | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
