2008 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 65 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. (195 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Epica | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Epica | Sigma |
Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2730 mm |