2008 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 808 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Epica | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Epica | E-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 132 L |