2008 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2012 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Epica would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Epica.
Because 2012 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Epica | 2012 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Epica | Caprice |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |