2008 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Epica would be higher. At 1,992 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Epica | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Epica | Pixo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 207 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |