2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 820 kg more than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
| Model | Equinox | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2430 mm |
