2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 665 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (286 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Equinox | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2540 mm |