2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 151 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1964 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Equinox | Munga |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 31 L |
