2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (186 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 91 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Equinox | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 186 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |