2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1974 Mazda 616
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 838 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (286 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1974 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Equinox | 616 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1974 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2480 mm |