2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (186 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 81 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Equinox | Celica |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2640 mm |
