2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (100 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 929 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Equinox | 929 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |
