2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1984 Mazda 929
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1984 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1984 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 109 kg more than 1984 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1984 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Equinox | 929 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1152 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |
