2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1986 Lotus Excel

To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lotus Excel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lotus Excel would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1986 Lotus Excel. (180 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1986 Lotus Excel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1023 kg more than 1986 Lotus Excel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Lotus Excel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Lotus Excel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Lotus Excel. (224 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Lotus Excel.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Chevrolet Equinox 1986 Lotus Excel
Make Chevrolet Lotus
Model Equinox Excel
Year Released 2008 1986
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3350 cc 2174 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 185 HP 180 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 224 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.1 mm 95.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.9:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2200 kg 1177 kg
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1020 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 31 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]