2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1992 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1992 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Equinox | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2460 mm |
