2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 530 kg more than 1993 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (286 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Equinox | 626 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 168 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |
