2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (186 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 209 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Equinox | F1 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 45 L |
