2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2004 Citroen C 15
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 755 kg more than 2004 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen C 15. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C 15. (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 2004 Citroen C 15 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Equinox | C 15 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 23.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 66 L |