2008 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 219 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Equinox.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Countryman has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Countryman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Equinox | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 47 L |
