2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | HHR | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2290 mm |
