2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 498 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (206 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | HHR | 600 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1073 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2010 mm |