2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | HHR | HD |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |