2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1967 Seat 1500
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1967 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Seat 1500 weights approximately 87 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1967 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1967 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | HHR | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1479 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1073 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2660 mm |
