2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1969 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,032 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1969 Holden Monaro. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Monaro.
Because 1969 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Monaro. (246 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1969 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | HHR | Monaro |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2830 mm |