2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1973 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1973 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1973 Skoda 1202.
Because 1973 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Skoda 1202. (85 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1973 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | HHR | 1202 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2690 mm |