2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1977 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1977 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1977 Chrysler 160.
Because 1977 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1977 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | HHR | 160 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2680 mm |