2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | HHR | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1116 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2460 mm |
