2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1983 Reliant SE6
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1983 Reliant SE6. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1983 Reliant SE6.
Because 1983 Reliant SE6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Reliant SE6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Reliant SE6. (233 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Reliant SE6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1983 Reliant SE6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Reliant |
Model | HHR | SE6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2650 mm |