2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1987 Mazda 626
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1987 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mazda 626. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1987 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | HHR | 626 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1987 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2580 mm |