2008 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1996 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Terrano II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Terrano II would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1996 Nissan Terrano II. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1996 Nissan Terrano II.
Because 1996 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Nissan Terrano II. (197 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Nissan Terrano II.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet HHR | 1996 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | HHR | Terrano II |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2470 mm |