2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600.
Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (290 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Impala | 1963 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Impala | 600 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3507 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2010 mm |
