2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1967 Volvo 120
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (233 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1967 Volvo 120. (89 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1967 Volvo 120.
Because 1967 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volvo 120. (146 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Impala | 1967 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Impala | 120 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 233 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |