2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1970 Volvo 145
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (233 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1970 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1970 Volvo 145.
Because 1970 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Volvo 145. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Impala | 1970 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Impala | 145 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 233 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2620 mm |