2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1994 Rover 400
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1994 Rover 400. (88 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (290 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 400. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Impala | 1994 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
| Model | Impala | 400 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3507 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2560 mm |
