2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (303 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (438 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Impala | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Impala | Zo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 303 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 438 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 83 L |