2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 3,505 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 311 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Impala.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (290 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (183 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Impala | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | Tribute |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3505 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |