2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (303 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (438 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Impala | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | E-250 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 303 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 438 Nm | 388 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 132 L |