2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP) has 58 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (290 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Impala | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | Epica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |