2008 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (303 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Caprice.
Because 2010 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (438 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Impala | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 303 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 438 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
