2008 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1991 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 400 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Lumina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Chevrolet Lumina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Lumina (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Lumina | 1991 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Lumina | Tempo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2305 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2540 mm |