2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1950 Maserati 8CLT
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 8CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 8CLT would be higher. At 2,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Maserati 8CLT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 8CLT (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. (164 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 8CLT should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1950 Maserati 8CLT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati 8CLT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati 8CLT has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati 8CLT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1950 Maserati 8CLT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Malibu | 8CLT |
Year Released | 2008 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 2980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 424 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2730 mm |