2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1964 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1964 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
Model | Malibu | 312 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 43 L |