2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (164 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (216 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 57 L |