2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (164 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Because 1969 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (216 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
Model | Malibu | 966 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2170 mm |