2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1972 Holden Torana
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (219 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (297 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (131 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1972 Holden Torana | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Malibu | Torana |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1759 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 219 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 297 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2440 mm |