2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1972 Holden Torana
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (163 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1972 Holden Torana | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Malibu | Torana |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2550 mm |